Resource type:	Book
Title:	DIGITAL SOCIETY AND LIBRARIES: NEW CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES, POTENTIAL FOR INTERACTION / IN: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES OF THE SCIENTIFIC LIBRARY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE KNOWLEDGE INFRASTRUCTURE OF THE DIGITAL SOCIETY: MONOGRAPH / ED. BY S. S. HARAHULIA; NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF UKRAINE, V. I. VERNADSKYI NATIONAL LIBRARY OF UKRAINE. KYIV : VNLU. PP. 15–101
Authors:	Serhii Harahulia Olena Kliushnikova Yurii Kovtaniuk Svitlana Kyrylenko Nataliia Lakhtarina Tetiana Polishchuk Oksana Sandul Viktor Zaika
Year:	2025
ISBN:
Publication Language:	Ukrainian
Publisher:	VNLU
Place Published:	Kyiv
DOI:	10.15407/r_nbuv.0005179.80

In § 1.1. “From card catalogs to personal reader accounts: the evolution of library systems and the reader experience” (Viktor Zaika) the author describes the evolution of library systems from card catalogs to integrated electronic platforms and personalized digital services, demonstrating the profound transformation of the reader experience and the changing role of libraries in the scientific and educational sphere. The transition from manual cataloging to automated systems has not only provided quick access to resources, but has also created the conditions for the introduction of a new logic of interaction between the user and the library infrastructure. Modern technologies allow readers to independently manage their own information environment: create lists of literature, extend loan periods, order books online, receive recommendations, use digital copies of documents, and access remote support services. The transformation of traditional catalogs into full-fledged electronic user accounts significantly expands the possibilities for personalization, which is in line with the trends of a digital society dominated by mobility, speed of access, individualization, and interactivity.This evolutionary process also reflects changes in the organization of library collections and in the methods of storing and presenting information. The digitization of documents, the creation of electronic collections, and the integration of libraries into global information networks provide a new level of openness and accessibility of knowledge. As a result, the library ceases to be just a physical space and becomes a multidimensional digital service capable of providing continuous information support regardless of the user's location. The evolution of library systems demonstrates not just the modernization of technical tools, but a profound change in the logic of working with knowledge — from searching through static card records to interactive interaction with dynamic digital data.In § 1.2. “Formation of the knowledge infrastructure of the digital society: resources, services, and technologies of scientific libraries” (Serhii Harahulia, Svitlana Kyrylenko, Olena Kliushnikova, Nataliia Lakhtarina, Tetiana Polishchuk, Oksana Sandul) analyzes the formation of the knowledge infrastructure of the digital society defines the mission of scientific libraries as the core elements of the information ecosystem, providing access to structured resources, high-quality services, and modern technological solutions. In the digital environment, the library becomes not only a repository of information, but also an organizer of intellectual space, in which data acquires meaning through systematization, analytical processing, and integration into research processes. Electronic catalogs, digital repositories, scientific databases, virtual reading rooms, open science services, and bibliography management tools form a comprehensive knowledge system capable of supporting research at all stages – from searching for sources to publishing results.The role of libraries in shaping the information infrastructure also lies in ensuring technological compatibility, standardizing metadata, supporting the digital identity of researchers, and developing scientific communication services. They act as integrators, combining diverse information resources into a single, universally accessible space. In this context, the library emerges as an institution capable of ensuring the reliability, authenticity, and long-term preservation of scientific data, both traditional and digital. Thus, the development of knowledge infrastructure not only defines a new format for library activities but also creates conditions for the formation of an inclusive, open, and sustainable scientific environment.In § 1.3. “Information and analytical activities of libraries in the paradigm of the knowledge society: issues, requests, contexts” (Serhii Harahulia, Olena Kliushnikova, Oksana Sandul) the authors examine how, in the paradigm of the knowledge society, the information and analytical activities of libraries are becoming a strategically important component of scientific communication and intellectual infrastructure. The focus is shifting from collecting resources to creating added value in the form of analytics, expertise, thematic reviews, monitoring of scientific trends, assessment of publication activity, and support for academic integrity. Scientific libraries respond to the growing demands of researchers who need not only access to information, but also in-depth analysis of contexts, methodological support, and tools for working with large amounts of data. The reorientation towards analytical activities indicates the formation of a new type of library expertise that combines information literacy with research skills.The issues of information and analytical activities cover the reliability of data, the relevance of sources, the interpretation of scientometric indicators, and the provision of objective monitoring of scientific trends. In these conditions, the library becomes an intermediary between heterogeneous information flows, acting as a guarantor of quality and scientific correctness. The analytical products of libraries contribute to management decision-making in the field of science, the formation of development strategies, and the identification of priority areas of research. As a result, information and analytical activities transform the library into an active participant in the intellectual process, capable of forming new meanings and structuring knowledge on the scale of an institution or scientific community.In § 1.4. “Improving the research support system: library experience in the age of digitization” (Serhii Harahulia, Yurii Kovtaniuk), the authors reflect on the fact that in the age of digitization, improving the research support system is one of the most important vectors for the development of scientific libraries. The digital transformation of the scientific environment is changing the demands of researchers, who need comprehensive information support — from access to high-quality resources to consultations on scientific communication, data management, and open access publishing. Libraries are becoming service support centers that combine technological capabilities, information expertise, and methodological support. The development of repositories, the introduction of electronic platforms for the submission and dissemination of scientific materials, and the use of analytical tools contribute to increasing the transparency, accessibility, and reproducibility of scientific activity.Library experience in research support shows that the digital environment creates new models of interaction: personalized consulting, publication support, digital literacy training programs, academic integrity support, and data management. This enables libraries to become knowledge platforms that promote the development of research competencies and the formation of open science. At the same time, improvements to the support system allow libraries to strengthen their role in the global scientific ecosystem, ensuring the stability, sustainability, and innovation of research processes. Thus, in the digital age, the library is not only a service institution but also an active partner in science, providing a reliable foundation for the effective creation and dissemination of knowledge.

  Full-text PDF     Citation

Cite:

1. Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities. (2008). Morphology, II(2), 82–83. https://web.archive.org/web/20161109112754/http://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/doc/Morphology_2008_2_2_19.pdf
2. Library Knowledge Portals: Monograph / Ed. in Chief K. V. Lobuzina; Ed. S. S. Garagulia. (2022). Kyiv: National Library of Ukraine Vernadsky. http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/everlib/item/er-0004512
3. Library-Bibliographic Classification. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Бібліотечно-бібліографічна_класифікація
4. Vakarenko, O., Radchenko, A., & Bolkotun, Z. (2022). Specialized resource for academic books: Concept and pilot version. Library Bulletin, 1, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.15407/bv2022.01.003
5. Zagorodnii, A. H. (Ed.). (2025). Open science: Vision of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Collective monograph). Kyiv: Akademperiodika. https://doi.org/10.15407/akademperiodyka.555.202
6. Harahulia, S. S., & Symonenko, T. V. (2025). Research support services in digital humanities: Approaches, technologies, tools. Manuscript and Book Heritage of Ukraine, 2, 189–203. https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.37.189
7. Harahulia, S. S. (2025). Digital tools for the development of library collections of historical and cultural heritage sources. Manuscript and Book Heritage of Ukraine, 4, 194–212. https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.39.194
8. Humenchuk, A. (2020). Components of the digital culture of a library professional. Ukrainian Journal of Library and Information Science, 5, 96–105. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7654.5.2020.205733
9. Huralyuk, A. (2020). Library in the information society: Ontological approach. Adaptive Management: Theory and Practice. Series: Pedagogy, 8. https://doi.org/10.33296/2707-0255-8(15)-03
10. Huralyuk, A., Rostoka, M., & Varaksina, N. (2020). Library in the knowledge society. Adaptive Management: Theory and Practice. Series: Pedagogy, 10. https://doi.org/10.33296/2707-0255-10(19)-10
11. Zharinov, S. S., Vasylenko, A. Y., Krasovskyi, O. S., & Rybalko, Y. V. (2024). Unification of research registries using CRIS systems: Case of the National Electronic Scientific Information System. Manuscript and Book Heritage of Ukraine, 4, 285–298. https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.35.285
12. Zharinova, A., & Yaroshenko, T. (2023). Deposition of intellectual activity results: Challenges and opportunities of open access and open science for Ukraine. Ukrainian Journal of Library and Information Science, 11, 62–81. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7654.11.2023.282663
13. Zavadska, N., & Ihnatiuk, M. (2020). Formation of information competence as a guarantee of academic integrity: The role of the university library. Ukrainian Journal of Library and Information Science, 5, 44–65. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7654.5.2020.205729
14. Ivashkevich, O. (2023). Soft skills as a mainstream vector in the library field. Ukrainian Journal of Library and Information Science, 12, 56–66. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7654.12.2023.293571
15. Dubrovina, L. A. (Ed.). (2024). Innovative library scientific resources, digital collections and services in the development of research infrastructure: Analytical report. Kyiv: National Library of Ukraine Vernadsky. http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/everlib/item/er-0005011
16. Kalyuzhna, N. M. (2023). Implementation of open access principles in Ukraine: Current state and development prospects. Digital Platform: Information Technologies in the Sociocultural Sphere, 6(1), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.31866/2617-796X.6.1.2023.283984
17. Karashchuk, O. (2024). Libraries as a tool to counter disinformation in the modern world in the context of Russian aggression against Ukraine. Scientific Works of the National Library of Ukraine Vernadsky, 73, 118–138. https://doi.org/10.15407/np.73.118
18. Klyushnikova, O. V., & Sandul, O. H. (2025). Library information activity in the knowledge society paradigm. In Library. Science. Communication. Priorities of the Present and Prospects (pp. –). Kyiv: NBUV. https://doi.org/10.15407/r_nbuv.0005157
19. Kobyzhcha, N. I. (2023). “Digital death and immortality” in contemporary scientific discourse. Digital Platform: Information Technologies in the Sociocultural Sphere, 6(1), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.31866/2617-796X.6.1.2023.283991
20. Koval, T., & Lopata, O. (2021). Prospects for the development of national libraries in the digital society era. Library Bulletin, 2, 3–16. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/bv_2021_2_3
21. Kovtanyuk, Y., & Bezpala, H. (2024). Culture starts anew: Digital programs for libraries and archives of Germany and Ukraine. Library Bulletin, 3, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.15407/bv2024.03.042
22. Kopanieva, V. O. (2020). Library in the environment of digital science: System-integrative interaction (Monograph). Kyiv: Lira–K.
23. Kopanieva, V. O., Kostenko, L. Y., Novytskyi, O. V., & Reznichenko, V. A. (2023). Tasks of digital transformation of the scientific-information environment. Programming Problems, 1, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.15407/pp2023.01.003
24. Kropocheva, N. M. (2024). Information support of research based on bibliometric methods in the context of digitalization: Experience of educational libraries. Library Mercury, 1, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.18524/2707-3335.2024.1(31).305540
25. Kulish, Y. (2023). Features of the digital environment of university libraries at the present stage. Ukrainian Journal of Library and Information Science, 11, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7654.11.2023.282651
26. Kunanets, N., Lypak, H., & Bilousova, R. (2024). Formation of virtual spaces of modern libraries: Trends and challenges. Scientific Works of the National Library of Ukraine Vernadsky, 72, 246–273. https://doi.org/10.15407/np.72.246
27. Lypak, H. I. (2019). Formation of consolidated information resources of libraries, archives and museums of territorial communities (Doctoral dissertation abstract). Kyiv: National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, National Library of Ukraine Vernadsky. http://nbuv.gov.ua/sites/default/files/disser/aref_lypak_0.pdf
28. Lobuzin, I. V. (2014). Digital complex of a modern scientific library: Registration, storage and data processing. Registration, Storage and Data Processing, 16(2), 100–113. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/rzod_2014_16_2_12
29. Lobuzina, K. V., Harahulia, S. S., Konoval, L. V., & Lobuzin, I. V. (2020). Library of the digital society in ensuring systematic support of scientific research. Library Science. Documentation Science. Informology, 4, 5–12. https://doi.org/10.32461/2409-9805.4.2020.227040
30. Makarova, M. (2024). Digital projects in the library sphere of Ukraine. Digital Platform: Information Technologies in the Sociocultural Sphere, 7(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.31866/2617-796X.7.1.2024.307014
31. Maranchak, M. (2024). Prospects for the use of artificial intelligence technologies by public libraries of Ukraine. Ukrainian Journal of Library and Information Science, 13, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7654.13.2024.307118
32. Marina, O. Y. (2018). Libraries of Ukraine in the digital media space: Theoretical and methodological foundations of development (Doctoral dissertation abstract). Kharkiv: Kharkiv State Academy of Culture. http://elib.nakkkim.edu.ua/handle/123456789/2979
33. Matvienko, O., & Tsyvin, M. (2022). Digital curation as social-educational activity of a library professional. Ukrainian Journal of Library and Information Science, 9, 34–46. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7654.9.2022.259145
34. Matvienko, O., & Tsyvin, M. (2021). “Digital” professions of information specialists: Educational perspectives and labor market requirements. Ukrainian Journal of Library and Information Science, 7, 58–70. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7654.7.2021.233279
35. Matviichuk, L. (2024). Socio-cultural practices of the National Library of Ukraine Vernadsky in developing the information-communication space. Scientific Works of the National Library of Ukraine Vernadsky, 73, 41–73. https://doi.org/10.15407/np.73.041
36. Melnyk-Khokha, H., & Mudrokha, V. (2023). Electronic infrastructure of the Lviv National Scientific Library of Ukraine named after V. Stefanyk. Library Bulletin, 2, 7–17. https://doi.org/10.15407/bv2023.02.007
37. Nazarovets, M. (2020). Digital tools to support scientific communication in higher education libraries (Doctoral dissertation abstract). Kharkiv: Kharkiv State Academy of Culture. http://nrat.ukrintei.ua/searchdok/0421U100
38. Novalska, T. (2020). Evolution of library space and information-communication infrastructure of the Scientific Library of KNUKiM. Ukrainian Journal of Library and Information Science, 5, 150–153. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7654.5.2020.205737
39. Ovsienko, A. (2021). Adaptation of libraries to the realities of the digital space. Socium. Document. Communication. Series: Historical Sciences, 12, 255–269. https://doi.org/10.31470/2518-7600-2021-12-255-269
40. Onishchenko, O. (2020). Adaptation of libraries to “life in the digital.” Library Bulletin, 1, 3–8. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/bv_2020_1_3
41. Samokhina, N., & Pelyukhovska, I. (2022). Systemic transformations of library-information processes. Scientific Works of the National Library of Ukraine Vernadsky, 66, 196–210. https://doi.org/10.15407/np.66.196
42. Serbin, O., & Perenesienko, I. (n.d.). Colon classification and its author – interconnection in the evolution of the epoch. http://eprints.rclis.org/23738/1/perenesienko.pdf
43. Sidina, O. (2024). Multidimensional model of library space in the era of convergence: Foreign scientific discourse. Ukrainian Journal of Library and Information Science, 14, 44–54. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7654.14.2024.318307
44. Tolmach, M. (2022). Digital competence of library professionals as a factor in library activity in the context of digital transformation. Ukrainian Journal of Library and Information Science, 9, 57–69. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7654.9.2022.259152
45. Tolmach, M. S. (2024). Digital competence as an integral characteristic of professional activity of library specialists (Doctoral dissertation abstract). Kyiv: Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts. https://nrat.ukrintei.ua/searchdoc/0424U000271/
46. Tyurkedzhi, N. (2021). Assistive technologies in libraries: Global and national experience. Library Bulletin, 1, 48–55.
47. Universal Decimal Classification. (n.d.). https://vue.gov.ua/ВУЕ:Універсальна_десяткова_класифікація
48. Khrushch, S., Kushnaryov, V., Liutyi, A., & Onishchenko, I. (2023). Immersive technologies for electronic libraries. Digital Platform: Information Technologies in the Sociocultural Sphere, 6(2), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.31866/2617-796X.6.2.2023.293605
49. Khrushch, S. S. (2023). Formation of an innovative media space in public libraries of Ukraine (Doctoral dissertation abstract). Kyiv: Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts. https://nrat.ukrintei.ua/searchdoc/0423U100093/
50. Dubrovina, L. A. (2020). Digital library resources and research support services: Current approaches and role in scientific communication: Analytical note. Kyiv: National Library of Ukraine Vernadsky. http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/everlib/item/er-0003844
51. Shemaieva, H., & Prilutska, A. (2023). New library roles in the scientific communication system in the context of open science. Scientific Works of the National Library of Ukraine Vernadsky, 68, 301–315. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1053-989X
52. Shemaieva, H., Prilutska, A., & Kysliuk, L. (2024). Current trends in European information and library education (LIS). Scientific Works of the National Library of Ukraine Vernadsky, 72, 475–490. https://doi.org/10.15407/np.72.475
53. Yaroshenko, T. (2021). Open access, open science, open data: How it started and where we are going (on the 20th anniversary of the Budapest Open Access Initiative). Ukrainian Journal of Library and Information Science, 8, 10–26. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7654.8.2021.247582
54. Yaroshenko, T. O., Serbin, O. O., & Yaroshenko, O. I. (2022). Open science: The role of universities and libraries in contemporary changes in scientific communication. Digital Platform: Information Technologies in the Sociocultural Sphere, 5(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.31866/2617-796X.5.2.2022.270132
55. Adeleke, A., & Durodolu, O. (2025). Trends in library and information services. In Encyclopedia of libraries, librarianship, and information science (pp. 539–551). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95689-5.00157-7
56. Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-American_Cataloguing_Rules
57. Arora, J. (n.d.). Historical evolution of digital libraries. https://ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in/lisp8/chapter/historical-evolution-of-digital-libraries
58. Baker, D. (2025). The future of libraries, librarianship, and information services. In Encyclopedia of libraries, librarianship, and information science (pp. 93–99). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95689-5.00218-2
59. Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2009). The dark side of information: Overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies. Journal of Information Science, 35(2), 180–191. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220195805_The_Dark_Side_of_Information_Overload_Anxiety_and_Other_Paradoxes_and_Pathologies
60. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic web. Scientific American, 35–43. https://lassila.org/publications/2001/SciAm.pdf
61. Borghman, C. L. (1996). Why are online catalogs still hard to use? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(7), 493–503. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3mz7h8hr
62. Borodai, I., Tatarchuk, L., & Pidhaina, T. (2022). Information technology in activities of the world’s leading libraries and their use under modern communications. Український журнал з бібліотекознавства та інформаційних наук, 9, 80–91. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7654.9.2022.259154
63. Breeding, M. (2007). Chapter 1: Introduction. Library Technology Reports, 4, 5–14. https://journals.ala.org/index.php/ltr/article/view/4535/5322
64. Broeder, D., Jones, B., Kelsey, D., Kershaw, P., Lüders, S., Lyall, A., Nyrönen, T., Wartel, R., & Weyer, H. J. (2012). Federated identity management for research collaborations. CERN-OPEN-2012-006. https://cds.cern.ch/record/1442597
65. Buckland, M. (1992). Redesigning library services: A manifesto. American Library Association, 9–18.
66. Cen, Z., & Zhao, Y. (202?). Enhancing user engagement through adaptive interfaces: A study on real-time personalization in web applications. Journal of Economic Theory and Business Management, 1(6), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.70393/6a6574626d.323332
67. Coyle, K. (2010). Understanding the semantic web: Bibliographic data and metadata. Library Technology Reports, 46(1), 5–31. https://kcoyle.net/ltr2010-01.pdf
68. Desmarchelier, B., Djellal, F., Gallouj, F., & Gallouj, N. (2025). Beyond the reverse product cycle: An exploration of the digital, social and spatial transformation of libraries. Research Policy, 54(8), 105297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105297
69. Dewey, M. (1989). Dewey decimal classification and relative index (20th ed.). Forest Press.
70. Dubrovina, L., Kovtaniuk, Y., & Harahulia, S. (2025). Regulatory and legal framework, research, and prospects for artificial intelligence implementation in archival and library affairs in Ukraine: An analytical review. Science and Innovation, 21(5), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine21.05.018
71. Eversberg, B. (n.d.). 13 years of allegro: Questions, demands, users. In Proceedings of the IATUL Conferences (pp. 221–236). https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1024&context=iatul#:~:text=allegro%20is%20a%20database%20system,low%20demands%20on%20systems%20resources
72. Ferwerda, E. (2023). Open access to books – The perspective of a non-profit infrastructure provider. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 26(1). https://journals.publishing.umich.edu/jep/article/id/3303/
73. Ferreira, R., Leite, M., Semedo, D., & Magalhães, J. (2021). Open domain conversational search assistant with transformers. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08197
74. Ferrer, X., van Nuenen, T., Such, J., Coté, M., & Criado, N. (2020). Bias and discrimination in AI: A cross-disciplinary perspective. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.07309
75. Haq, A., & Jan, R. (2025). Assessing research support services in academic libraries: A systematic literature review. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 72, 280–297. https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v72i3.18904
76. Harper, L. M., & Oltmann, S. M. (2017). Big data’s impact on privacy for librarians and information professionals. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 43(4), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/bul2.2017.1720430406
77. Horban, Y. (2024). Digital transformation of Ukrainian libraries: Current state and prospects. African Journal of Applied Research, 10(1), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.26437/ajar.v10i1.672
78. Indrák, M., & Pokorná, L. (2020). Analysis of digital transformation of services in a research library. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 70(12), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-09-2019-0118
79. Issa, A., Adeyemi, O., & Oyedokun, T. (2025). Libraries in the information society. In Encyclopedia of libraries, librarianship, and information science (pp. 353–361). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95689-5.00057-2
80. Kaarsted, T., Blake, O., Nielsen, K. H., Alving, B., Rasmussen, L., Overgaard, A. K., & Hansen, S. (2023). How European research libraries can support citizen-enhanced open science. Open Information Science, 7(1), Article 20220146. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2022-0146
81. Khimich, Y. (2024). Innovative activity and transformational processes in development of public libraries in Ukraine under the influence of world trends of digital society and current realities. Library Science. Record Studies. Informology, 20(1), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.63009/lsrsi/1.2024.70
82. Kjellström, Z. (2025). Decentralized digital preservation: The LOCKSS initiative and shadow libraries. Online Information Review, 49(8), 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-02-2024-0088
83. Kumar, A. V., & Chidambaram, M. (2025). Personalization and user behavior analysis in digital libraries: A systematic review. Academic Research Journal of Science and Technology (ARJST), 2(02), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.63300/
84. Lagoze, C., Krafft, D., Cornwell, T., Dushay, N., Eckstrom, D., & Saylor, J. (n.d.). Metadata aggregation and “automated digital libraries”: A retrospective on the NSDL experience. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0601125
85. Leong, J. H.-T. (2024). Innovative technologies and their application in academic libraries. Український журнал з бібліотекознавства та інформаційних наук, 13, 44–60. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7654.13.2024.307116
86. Library of Congress Classification. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Congress_Classification
87. Library portal. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_portal
88. Malo, S. F., & Al Zebari, A. (2025). Intelligent semantic search for academic journals using AI and NLP techniques. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(41s), 404–420. https://jisem-journal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/7884/3594
89. Mandal, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence in academic libraries: Applications and impact review. International Journal of Innovations in Science Engineering And Management, 3(4), 1–9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385224334_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Academic_Libraries_Applications_and_Impact_Review
90. Michalak, S. (2005). Portals and libraries (pp. 29–31). Routledge. https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=B-apfN8v5T8C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q
91. Morgan, E. L. (2004). Portal in libraries: Portal implementation, issues and challenges. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 31(1), 22–23. https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bult.1720310112
92. Neubauer, W., & Piguet, A. (2009). The knowledge portal, or, the vision of easy access to information. Library Hi Tech, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830911007691
93. Nirudi, Y. (2024). Artificial intelligence in libraries: An overview. Management of Digital Information Resources, 3–26. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5080670
94. Oyelude, A. (2024). Technology trends for libraries in the AI era. Library Hi Tech News, 42(2), 6–7. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-05-2025-0074
95. OPAC. (n.d.). https://sites.google.com/view/sherubtselibrary/opac
96. Privacy: An interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights. (2002, rev. 2019). American Library Association. https://www.ala.org/sites/default/files/aboutala/content/B.2.1.17%20Privacy%20.pdf
97. Putnings, M. (2022). Non-fungible token (NFT) in the academic and open access publishing environment: Considerations towards science-friendly scenarios. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.3998/jep.2574
98. Resource Description and Access. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_Description_and_Access
99. Roy, D., & Dutta, M. (2022). A systematic review and research perspective on recommender systems. Journal of Big Data, 9, Article 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-022-00592-5
100. Shahbazi, N., Lin, Y., Asudeh, A., & Jagadish, H. V. (2022). Representation bias in data: A survey on identification and resolution techniques. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.11852
101. Shahzad, K. (2025). A systematic literature review of the effects of virtual reality on innovative library services in academic settings. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-06-2024-0389
102. Siemens, G. (2013). Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1380–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213498857 https://docslib.org/doc/9840152/learning-analytics-the-emergence-of-a-discipline
103. Somipam, R. S., Subaveerapandiyan, A., & Ahmad, N. (2025). Digital transformation in academic libraries: E-resources, OPACs and AI in information discovery. Reference Services Review, 53(2), 238–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-12-2024-0078
104. Sousa, N. M. T. (2025). Academic libraries as hubs of artificial intelligence competency. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00490-8
105. The public library service: IFLA/UNESCO guidelines for development. (2001), 2–11.
106. Wang, M. (2025). Research on artificial intelligence in libraries. Research on Artificial Intelligence in Libraries, 519–526. https://dl.acm.org/doi/full/10.1145/3728199.3728285
107. What is a MARC record and why is it important? (n.d.). Network Development and MARC Standards Office, Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/marc/umb/um01to06.html
108. Zareef, M. (2025). A systematic review of digital curation services in academic libraries: Navigating policies, skills and challenges. Digital Library Perspectives, 41(3), 518–543. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-10-2024-0158